i’ve thought about it over and over and these are the options from what i can tell:
- they made the episode terrible on purpose for Some Reason yet to be revealed
- mofftiss somehow accidentally wrote a beautiful gay love story and finally managed to get overly excited and write a bad episode
- mofftiss wrote a series of increasingly random images with no overarching plot but benedict and martin were determined to play john and sherlock as in love and pining
- mofftiss wrote a series of increasingly random images with no overarching plot but benedict and martin are just actually in love and pining for one another and also horrible actors
- mofftiss wrote a beautiful gay love story on purpose and then wrote the worst episode ever just to fuck with lgbt fans because they (mofftiss) are evil
I guess there’s also:
- wrote a gay love story as a joke they never intended to resolve yet went so far as to carefully code the props and wardrobe with it, and to establish double-meanings for phrases like “wear the hat” and “have dinner,” and to cram queer allusions into every nook and cranny
This is TFP Hell. We have all potential realities listed, and yet literally every option feels weird and unrealistic
Are we literally just supposed the be the little boy in The Princess Bride? the general audience thinks kissing stories are gross (when gay) and instead demand adventures, but the storytellers get them so invested in the romance that the audience starts protesting when the storytellers try to skip past the (gay) kissing scenes? And that aligns nicely with The Final Problem being the ACD story that made the audience protest the storyteller. And Clue having multiple endings
idk dudes that’s all I’ve got, maybe I just want everything to be clever
silverliningjohn